Maritime QuestionsLeadership

This near-miss never became an injury claim. What made the difference, according to Gard's human-centred safety framing?

A. Luck — the crew member happened not to slip
B. A crew member felt able to report a hazard and accept a short delay, rather than absorbing time pressure silently
C. The task was inherently low-risk
D. Strict enforcement of a written procedure
Sign in or create a free account to see the answer and explanation.
Gard's loss prevention guidance repeatedly highlights that many serious incidents follow a 'normalisation of deviance' — small departures from procedure that become accepted because nothing went wrong before. As Master, what's the most effective way to counter this on board?
A. Leave procedural compliance to each head of department, with no cross-checking
B. Wait until an incident occurs, then retrain the individuals involved
C. Rely on the SMS manual alone — if it's written down, crew will follow it
D. Actively encourage crew to raise near-misses and procedural drift without fear of blame, and personally follow the same standards you expect of others
Sign in or create a free account to see the answer and explanation.
Gard's guidance on near-miss reporting notes that crew sometimes hesitate to report their own minor errors or close calls. As an OOW, why does Gard say this matters for the wider fleet, not just your own ship?
A. Near-miss reports are only useful for the annual safety meeting
B. Reporting near-misses is mainly a way to assign blame to the individual involved
C. It doesn't matter — near-misses on one ship have no bearing on others
D. Near-miss data, shared and analysed across a fleet (and via schemes like CHIRP Maritime), helps identify recurring risks before they cause a serious incident elsewhere
Sign in or create a free account to see the answer and explanation.
+169 more Leadership questions available

Create a free account to practise all 172 questions, track your accuracy, and build your Reputation Score.

Create Free Account