Maritime Questions › Vetting — Fire & LSA

A SIRE inspector observes that the vessel's fire and abandon ship drills are logged as completed every month with full attendance, but when questioned, two crew members assigned to the emergency fire party cannot state their own muster role or the location of their assigned breathing apparatus set. What does this indicate, and how should it be assessed?

A. No finding is appropriate as long as the drill log shows full attendance for the required period
B. This can only be assessed by reviewing the drill log dates, not by questioning crew
C. The drill logs reflect a paperwork-compliant but substantively hollow drill programme — this is a "Human Factors" finding independent of the Hardware/Procedures dimensions, and is a recognised root-cause pattern behind real shipboard fire fatalities where drills were "completed" without crew retaining functional knowledge of their role
D. Drill quality is outside the scope of SIRE 2.0, which only assesses physical equipment condition
Sign in or create a free account to see the answer and explanation.
Why are Fire Safety and Life Saving Appliances consistently the #1 and #2 deficiency/detention categories across both Paris MoU and Tokyo MoU statistics, year after year?
A. PSC inspectors are specifically instructed to find fire/LSA deficiencies even when none exist, to meet inspection quotas
B. These systems are only used in genuine emergencies, so degradation (corroded extinguishers, expired hydrostatic releases, faulty fire detection panels) goes unnoticed in routine operation until an inspector specifically tests them — unlike, say, a leaking pipe, which crew would notice and fix immediately because it affects daily work
C. Fire and LSA equipment is inherently less reliable than other shipboard systems regardless of maintenance
D. These categories were only added to the deficiency code list in 2025 and so naturally show high numbers
Sign in or create a free account to see the answer and explanation.
An inspector asks a crew member to demonstrate isolation of the fixed CO2 fire suppression system for the engine room. The crew member can point to the correct release station but cannot explain the pre-discharge alarm sequence or muster requirement. Under SIRE 2.0's grading, what does this represent?
A. An automatic detention, since CO2 systems are always detainable if misunderstood
B. An automatic full pass, since the physical equipment was correctly identified
C. This scenario is not assessable under SIRE 2.0 because CO2 systems are tested separately from the main inspection
D. A "Hardware" pass but a "Human Factors" failure — the equipment exists and is correctly located, but the crew member cannot demonstrate the procedural knowledge needed to use it safely, which is graded independently and can still result in a "Not as Expected" or "Largely Complies" finding
Sign in or create a free account to see the answer and explanation.
+5 more Vetting — Fire & LSA questions available

Create a free account to practise all 8 questions, track your accuracy, and build your Reputation Score.

Create Free Account