Maritime Questions › Permit To Work Rank
A cadet is told the fall-arrest harness for tomorrow's job hasn't been formally inspected in over a year, but it looks fine. Is "looks fine" good enough?
A. Yes, a visual check by the user is an adequate substitute for the formal inspection
B. It depends on whether the job is rated low-risk
C. No — fall-arrest equipment needs a periodic thorough examination by a competent person, not just a visual check, because damage like webbing fatigue isn't always visible
D. Yes, provided the harness is less than five years old overall
Sign in or create a free account to see the answer and explanation.
A. There is no fixed maximum — it depends entirely on the job
B. 48 hours, renewable once without re-inspection
C. 24 hours from issue, with any shorter job-specific time limits also stated on the permit
D. 7 days, matching the standard watch rotation
Sign in or create a free account to see the answer and explanation.
A. Accept the outgoing OOW's assessment and take no further action since the job scope hasn't changed
B. Cancel the job immediately without consulting the authorising officer
C. Wait until the 24-hour mark is actually reached before mentioning anything
D. Check elapsed time against the 24-hour limit, recognise it's close to expiry, and flag to the authorising officer that revalidation will be needed rather than letting it lapse unnoticed
Sign in or create a free account to see the answer and explanation.
+36 more Permit To Work Rank questions available
Create a free account to practise all 39 questions, track your accuracy, and build your Reputation Score.
Create Free Account