Maritime Questions › ISM / SMS

You're supervising a cargo operation and don't know exactly where every crew member on deck is positioned relative to the crane's active zone. What does the Karina C case suggest about this gap?

A. It's an acceptable limitation of supervising a large deck area single-handedly
B. It only matters if the crew member involved has a known history of unsafe behaviour
C. It's a coordination failure that directly enabled a fatality — the chief officer supervising Karina C's operation was unaware the second officer had entered the crush zone
D. Crew position tracking is the sole responsibility of the crane operator, not the supervising officer
Sign in or create a free account to see the answer and explanation.
Under the ISM Code and as reinforced in Gard's guidance to Members, the Master's overriding authority to make decisions for the safety of the ship and protection of the environment can be overruled by a commercial instruction from the company, such as a charterer's order to sail on schedule.
A. False
B. True
Sign in or create a free account to see the answer and explanation.
A crew member identifies that a piece of safety equipment does not match what is listed on the safety equipment plan. What is the correct way to handle this under the SMS?
A. Wait until the next external audit to mention it
B. Raise it as a non-conformity/observation through the SMS reporting process so it is recorded, investigated, corrected, and — if it reflects a wider issue — used to improve procedures or the safety equipment plan itself
C. Fix it quietly without telling anyone, to avoid paperwork
D. Only report it if it caused an incident
Sign in or create a free account to see the answer and explanation.
+263 more ISM / SMS questions available

Create a free account to practise all 266 questions, track your accuracy, and build your Reputation Score.

Create Free Account