Maritime QuestionsDP — Human Factors

A DPO is on watch during a sensitive DP3 drilling operation. DGNSS Unit 1 is showing a stable, clean position trace — exactly as expected in the calm conditions. DGNSS Unit 2 has been showing minor fluctuations. The DPO, reassured by Unit 1, pays less attention to Unit 2 and stops cross-checking the Fanbeam against both DGNSS units. Which human factor is operating, and what is its specific DP risk?

A. The risk is minimal because DGNSS Unit 1 and the Fanbeam are independently powered, removing the common cause failure risk
B. The DPO is correct to focus on the cleanest reference — a stable DGNSS trace is the best available data and should be trusted
C. Confirmation bias — seeking and weighting information that confirms the expected picture (stable position, calm conditions) while discounting or ignoring information that doesn't fit (fluctuating Unit 2). The specific DP risk is that Unit 2's fluctuations may be early signals of a developing fault, a common cause problem, or an actual position excursion that Unit 1 is not yet showing. Stopping cross-checks removes the comparison mechanism that position reference redundancy is built on
D. This is normal reference management — experienced DPOs learn which references are most reliable on their vessel and use them accordingly
Sign in or create a free account to see the answer and explanation.
A DP2 pipe-lay vessel has been exceeding its ASOG yellow wind limit by 2–4 knots on every watch for the past five days without incident. The lead DPO tells the incoming watch: 'Don't worry about the yellow alarm — it goes off in these conditions all the time and we just carry on. The old limit was too conservative anyway.' What is the danger in the lead DPO's reasoning?
A. The concern is only valid if a client representative is present on the bridge during the exceedance
B. The lead DPO is correct — if the vessel has held position every time, the limit was probably set too conservatively and can be informally adjusted upward
C. Repeated limit exceedance without incident is the definition of normalisation of deviance — each incident-free violation makes the next seem safer, eroding the original safety margin without any formal review. The ASOG limit exists because someone calculated the risk; overriding it verbally on the basis that "nothing happened" removes the agreed safety envelope without authorisation
D. The ASOG yellow limit is a guideline, not a hard limit — the DPO has discretion to continue past yellow if conditions feel manageable
Sign in or create a free account to see the answer and explanation.
A DPO is six hours into a twelve-hour DP watch on a cable-lay vessel. Conditions have been perfect all watch — flat calm, three good references, all systems green, no alarms. The DPO begins browsing the internet on a personal device to pass the time. What human factor is operating here, and what is the specific risk it creates in DP watchkeeping?
A. The DPO should use quiet periods for paperwork — productive use of downtime is more valuable than passive monitoring
B. Boredom is an acceptable state during calm DP watches — the automated system manages everything and the DPO is there as a backup
C. Extended uneventful periods create the highest complacency risk in DP watchkeeping: the DPO's vigilance degrades precisely because nothing has demanded it. When a fault develops — a reference dropout, a thruster fluctuation, a slow position drift — the response time increases because the DPO's attention is elsewhere. Long periods of routine are when the first small signals of developing problems are most likely to be missed
D. The risk is limited to DP Class 1 vessels — DP2 and DP3 systems have sufficient automated monitoring to compensate for reduced DPO attention during quiet periods
Sign in or create a free account to see the answer and explanation.
+3 more DP — Human Factors questions available

Create a free account to practise all 6 questions, track your accuracy, and build your Reputation Score.

Create Free Account