Question 1

Besides choke shackles, what other common pilot ladder deficiencies has the MAIB identified through its ongoing reporting?

Accepted Answer

The ladder being in poor condition (e.g. cracking, warping, flaking paint hiding underlying defects) or having missing/incorrect stanchions The MAIB's repeated reporting on cracking, warping, and flaking paint (which conceals defects) across multiple Safety Digest editions shows this is a persistent, recurring industry-wide problem — the same paint-hiding-defects hazard noted for wooden ladders in COSWP Chapter 17.

Question 2

In a documented gangway rigging fatality, what procedural gap was identified regarding how the rigging task was normally carried out by the crew?

Accepted Answer

The rigging of the handrail was understood by the crew to be a two-person evolution, but on the day the bosun proceeded with the task essentially alone after sending the deckhand away for life vests An informally understood 'two-person job' is not the same as a documented, enforced procedure — when the second person was sent away mid-task, there was no formal trigger requiring the work to pause until they returned, which connects directly to the lone-working and procedural-documentation gaps covered elsewhere in this module.

Question 3

According to MAIB Safety Digest reporting on pilot ladder deficiencies, what is a 'choke shackle' arrangement, and why is it dangerous?

Accepted Answer

A shackle secured over the ladder's side ropes rather than properly through the designed attachment point, which brings the entire weight of the ladder onto a single step that is not designed to bear that load One of the most common pilot ladder deficiencies identified by MAIB — it looks like a minor rigging shortcut, but it concentrates load on a structural element (a single step) never designed to carry the ladder's full weight, creating a failure point exactly where a pilot or crew member would be standing.