Maritime QuestionsShiphandling Engine Failure Cascade

What should the post-event debrief and any internal/external reporting specifically capture, beyond "engine telegraph fault occurred and was resolved by local control"?

A. The debrief should focus solely on assigning blame for the telegraph fault rather than reviewing the response
B. No debrief is needed since the vessel ultimately cleared the berth without contact or injury
C. Only the technical telegraph fault, with no discussion of the decision-making or communication during the event
D. The full chain of contributing factors (telegraph fault, wind timing, spring line overload risk, the decision-making at each step) and what worked well (the Master's assessment before letting go the spring, the disciplined local-control communication) as well as what should improve (telegraph fault investigation, spring line condition monitoring) — capturing both the near-miss and the resilient response gives a far more complete and useful picture than a short summary of cause and resolution
Sign in or create a free account to see the answer and explanation.
A single-screw vessel is unberthing, using a spring against slow ahead engine to walk the bow off the berth, with a moderate offshore wind. The engine suddenly fails to respond to an order to go astern. What is the OOW/Master's first action?
A. Take no action since the spring line alone is assumed sufficient to control the vessel indefinitely
B. Immediately let go all remaining lines, assuming this will resolve the situation
C. Immediately inform the engine room directly (not just via telegraph) of the non-response, assess the vessel's current trajectory and what is still controlling it (the spring line, remaining wind effect, any tug), and prepare to use those remaining resources while engine control is investigated — do not wait passively for the engine to respond on a repeated order
D. Repeat the same telegraph order several times and wait without taking any other action
Sign in or create a free account to see the answer and explanation.
With the engine still not responding, the spring line continues to hold the stern while the offshore wind pushes the bow further off the berth than planned, putting more load on the spring than intended. What is the risk now developing?
A. The spring line could be overloaded beyond its safe working load by the combination of wind force and the bow swing, risking it parting under tension — if it parts, the vessel would suddenly lose the one remaining controlling line with no engine available to compensate, and the snap-back risk to anyone near the line increases as load builds
B. The bow swinging further off the berth is the intended outcome and requires no further attention
C. The only risk is to the berth structure, not to the vessel or its mooring equipment
D. There is no increased risk; the spring line is designed to handle unlimited load regardless of wind or engine state
Sign in or create a free account to see the answer and explanation.
+7 more Shiphandling Engine Failure Cascade questions available

Create a free account to practise all 10 questions, track your accuracy, and build your Reputation Score.

Create Free Account