Maritime Questions › Legal / Command
Belle Mer's dragged anchor caused $240,000 of damage to a subsea fibre-optic cable, with no injury, pollution, or damage to the ship itself. What does this illustrate about anchoring risk?
A. That anchoring incidents only matter when they cause injury or pollution
B. That a dragging anchor can cause serious, costly third-party damage — to infrastructure like subsea cables — even when the vessel itself and its crew are never at risk
C. That subsea cable damage is rare enough not to factor into routine anchor planning
D. That only tankers and gas carriers need to consider cable-strike risk
Sign in or create a free account to see the answer and explanation.
A. The Master may only render assistance after receiving written authorisation from the company
B. The duty to render assistance does not apply if the persons are suspected irregular migrants — the Master may legally ignore them and continue on passage
C. The duty to render assistance to persons in distress at sea overrides immigration status considerations at the point of rescue; the Master must rescue and provide for their safety, while disembarkation arrangements and any immigration questions are a separate matter to be coordinated afterward with flag state, coastal state authorities and the company/DPA
D. Rendering assistance is discretionary and depends on whether the vessel has spare cabins
Sign in or create a free account to see the answer and explanation.
A. False
B. True
Sign in or create a free account to see the answer and explanation.
+203 more Legal / Command questions available
Create a free account to practise all 206 questions, track your accuracy, and build your Reputation Score.
Create Free Account