Maritime Questions › Engineering / Technical
A Finite Element Analysis study of Argos Georgia's shell door mechanism, completed after the sinking, found an unacceptable level of stress in the drive shaft, coupling, and key. What does this tell you about relying on visual inspection alone for mechanisms like this?
A. Visual inspection is always sufficient if carried out by an experienced crew member
B. A stress-related design vulnerability in a mechanism's internal components may not be visible or detectable through routine visual inspection at all — it can require engineering analysis to identify
C. The finding only applies to shell doors, not to other deck machinery
D. Visual inspection failures are always the crew's responsibility to catch
Sign in or create a free account to see the answer and explanation.
A. Only that the pump has been switched off
B. That the engine logbook has been updated first
C. Nothing extra — thermal oil drains are routine and can be opened immediately
D. That the system has cooled and depressurised, and you are positioned clear of the drain point's discharge path
Sign in or create a free account to see the answer and explanation.
A. Treat the gap as a hazard in its own right: apply a suitable cooling/depressurising period and full PPE before proceeding, and raise the procedure gap with the Chief Engineer
B. Delegate the task to a junior rating without further briefing, since the procedure covers it
C. Skip the task until a class surveyor is on board
D. Follow the procedure exactly as written — if it doesn't mention cooling or PPE, they're not required
Sign in or create a free account to see the answer and explanation.
+301 more Engineering / Technical questions available
Create a free account to practise all 304 questions, track your accuracy, and build your Reputation Score.
Create Free Account