Maritime Questions › Engineering / Technical
Your engine team followed the company's written procedure for draining a thermal oil system, but two crew were badly burned when hot oil sprayed out. The procedure itself turned out to be inadequate. As Chief Engineer, what does this mean for how you treat 'compliance' with written procedures?
A. Procedures only need reviewing after an incident has already occurred
B. Compliance with a written procedure always means the task was done safely — nothing more to consider
C. Compliance with a written procedure is necessary but not sufficient — procedures themselves need periodic review against real task conditions, especially for hazardous, infrequent jobs
D. This is solely a training issue for the crew involved, not a procedure issue
Sign in or create a free account to see the answer and explanation.
A. Only that the pump has been switched off
B. That the engine logbook has been updated first
C. Nothing extra — thermal oil drains are routine and can be opened immediately
D. That the system has cooled and depressurised, and you are positioned clear of the drain point's discharge path
Sign in or create a free account to see the answer and explanation.
A. Treat the gap as a hazard in its own right: apply a suitable cooling/depressurising period and full PPE before proceeding, and raise the procedure gap with the Chief Engineer
B. Delegate the task to a junior rating without further briefing, since the procedure covers it
C. Skip the task until a class surveyor is on board
D. Follow the procedure exactly as written — if it doesn't mention cooling or PPE, they're not required
Sign in or create a free account to see the answer and explanation.
+248 more Engineering / Technical questions available
Create a free account to practise all 251 questions, track your accuracy, and build your Reputation Score.
Create Free Account