Maritime QuestionsDP — What-If (Master/C-O)

Your lead DPO has been on watch for 14 hours managing a difficult DP operation in deteriorating weather. She reports she is fatigued and her concentration is significantly impaired. The only other DPO is medically unavailable. There is one more hour of critical pipe-lay before a natural suspension point. As master, what is the correct decision?

A. Take the decision to suspend DP operations and wait at a safe standoff until the DPO can be relieved or has rested. A fatigued DPO is a direct threat to the safety of the vessel and the operation — the master is both STCW and ISM Code-obligated to manage hours of rest and to not operate with a known impaired watchkeeper in a safety-critical role. The one remaining hour of pipe-lay is not a justification for knowingly continuing with a fatigued DPO
B. Ask the lead DPO to push through the final hour — she has managed 14 hours and one more is manageable
C. Ask the DPO to manage the situation from a seated position to reduce physical fatigue
D. Take over the DP console yourself as master, even without an active DP certificate
Sign in or create a free account to see the answer and explanation.
Your DP2 vessel needs to open the bus tie before commencing DP field operations. The chief engineer advises it will take 45 minutes to complete a power rebalance and safely open the bus. The vessel manager calls and says the client is furious about the delay — can the master just approve operating on closed bus 'briefly' inside the field? As master, what is the correct decision?
A. Approve it with the condition that it is documented in the DP logbook as a controlled deviation
B. Approve the closed bus operation — a 45-minute delay causes significant commercial harm and the risk is manageable
C. Seek the vessel manager's written approval before deciding — the decision is above the master's authority
D. Decline to approve closed bus DP operations inside the field. The 45-minute delay is a scheduling cost; a common cause failure on closed bus inside the field is a safety event with consequences potentially including total loss of DP, collision with the installation, and environmental damage. Commercial pressure is not a safety justification. The master's accountability to the ISM Code and the SMS cannot be commercially overridden
Sign in or create a free account to see the answer and explanation.
Reviewing the DP operations file, you discover that the last three-day operation completed yesterday had no formal ASOG signed by the client and master — the DPOs were working to verbal limits agreed informally between the lead DPO and the installation rep. As chief officer, what are your responsibilities in this situation?
A. Verbal ASOG limits agreed with the installation representative are acceptable under IMCA M109
B. Prepare a retroactive ASOG dated from the start of the operation to close the documentation gap
C. If the operation completed without incident, there's no further action required — the verbal limits clearly worked
D. Report the finding to the master, raise it through the SMS non-conformity process, and ensure a formal ASOG is in place before the next DP operation. The absence of a signed ASOG means the operation ran without the agreed, documented limits that protect the vessel, client, and crew — if an incident had occurred, liability and insurance implications would have been significant. Completing without incident does not mean the risk was acceptable
Sign in or create a free account to see the answer and explanation.
+5 more DP — What-If (Master/C-O) questions available

Create a free account to practise all 8 questions, track your accuracy, and build your Reputation Score.

Create Free Account