Maritime Questions › DP — Control System Failure (Cascade)

The OEM reviews the logs and identifies a known software bug, already documented in a service bulletin, that can cause exactly this kind of fault under a specific rare data condition. A patch exists. What should this finding change about how the event is treated?

A. Since it is a "known" bug, no further investigation or process review is needed — simply apply the patch and move on
B. The existence of a service bulletin means the vessel was at fault for not predicting the exact failure in advance
C. This is now a known, documented issue with an available fix — operations can reasonably resume once the patch is applied and verified, but this should also prompt a review of whether the service bulletin had been received and actioned earlier, since the vessel may have been operating with a known vulnerability that the patch process had not yet caught up to
D. Known software bugs do not need to be logged in the vessel's own DP incident records since the OEM already has them recorded
Sign in or create a free account to see the answer and explanation.
On a dual-redundant DP control system, DP Computer 1 (the currently active controller) throws an internal software fault and freezes. What should happen automatically, and what must the DPO verify?
A. The vessel should immediately drop anchor regardless of changeover success
B. The system should automatically switch over to DP Computer 2 (the standby/redundant controller) seamlessly, with thrusters continuing under DP2's control without interruption; the DPO must verify the changeover actually occurred cleanly, that DP2 has correct position and reference data, and that no thruster commands were lost or duplicated during the transition
C. No automatic action occurs for a software fault; only hardware faults trigger changeover
D. Thrusters automatically default to maximum power output until manually reset
Sign in or create a free account to see the answer and explanation.
Generators are running normally and all position reference systems show valid, agreeing positions, yet the vessel still experienced a brief uncommanded thrust transient during the changeover. What category of failure does this indicate, and why does it matter that the DPO correctly identifies it as such?
A. This is a control-system/software failure category, distinct from power generation or sensor failures — correctly identifying the category matters because the troubleshooting, the people who need to be involved (DP system OEM/software support, not just the electrical engineer), and the appropriate caution around trusting the "recovered" system are all different from a power or sensor event
B. It must be a sensor fault since thrust is downstream of position data
C. The category does not matter — all DP failures are addressed identically regardless of cause
D. It must be a power generation fault since any thrust transient implies an electrical issue
Sign in or create a free account to see the answer and explanation.
+7 more DP — Control System Failure (Cascade) questions available

Create a free account to practise all 10 questions, track your accuracy, and build your Reputation Score.

Create Free Account