Maritime QuestionsCOLREGS

Looking back at this whole developing situation: if you had delayed your original alteration by another 10 minutes, waiting to be 'more certain', what would the likely consequence have been?

A. No real consequence — COLREGS gives no benefit to acting earlier rather than later, provided action is eventually taken
B. A materially reduced CPA, less sea room and time to recover if the manoeuvre needed adjusting (as it did, once the other vessel also altered), and a real risk of the situation developing into a close-quarters situation under Rule 19-style last-minute avoidance rather than the early, unhurried Rule 8 action actually taken — this is exactly the pattern behind many MAIB collision findings: late recognition compounding into late, less effective action
C. The other vessel would have been legally obliged to give way instead, cancelling any risk
D. Delaying would have had no bearing on the outcome since the other vessel later altered course anyway
Sign in or create a free account to see the answer and explanation.
Rule 5 (Look-out) requires every vessel at all times to maintain a proper look-out by sight and hearing, as well as by all available means appropriate in the prevailing circumstances and conditions — and this duty applies even when the vessel is at anchor in a busy anchorage.
A. True
B. False
Sign in or create a free account to see the answer and explanation.
Under Rule 6 (Safe Speed), a vessel fitted with a fully operational radar and ARPA never needs to reduce speed in restricted visibility, because the equipment guarantees early detection of other vessels.
A. True
B. False
Sign in or create a free account to see the answer and explanation.
+499 more COLREGS questions available

Create a free account to practise all 502 questions, track your accuracy, and build your Reputation Score.

Create Free Account