You checked the radar minutes ago and saw no returns nearby. You're now considering leaving the bridge briefly to help with a task on deck, on a steady course, in clear visibility. What does the GWENVIDIK/LE SQUALE II collision demonstrate about relying on that earlier radar check?
A. A clear radar picture from a few minutes ago remains a reliable guarantee that the area is still clear now
B. A radar check is a snapshot, not a standing guarantee — leaving the bridge unattended removes the ability to detect a developing close-quarters situation, even in clear visibility
C. Clear visibility alone makes leaving the bridge briefly acceptable regardless of radar
D. This risk only applies in restricted visibility, not clear conditions
Sign in or create a free account to see the answer and explanation.
A. True
B. False
Sign in or create a free account to see the answer and explanation.
A. True
B. False
Sign in or create a free account to see the answer and explanation.
+465 more COLREGS questions available
Create a free account to practise all 468 questions, track your accuracy, and build your Reputation Score.
Create Free Account