Following a close-quarters situation that didn't result in a collision but came uncomfortably close, your examiner asks: "As Chief Officer reviewing this with the OOW involved, what should you ensure is preserved as evidence, and why does it matter even though nothing happened?"
A. VDR data (if the vessel doesn't have automatic long-term VDR retention, a manual save/download before it's overwritten), radar/ARPA plots or screenshots, the deck logbook entry made contemporaneously (not reconstructed afterwards), and a written statement from the OOW and lookout while memory is fresh — near-misses that are properly recorded feed both genuine safety learning (SMS non-conformity review, company-wide lessons) and protect the company and individuals if the incident is later scrutinised, e.g. by the other vessel's operator or a Port State authority
B. Nothing needs to be preserved since no collision or damage occurred, so there's no reporting obligation
C. Only the Master's personal account is relevant; junior officers' recollections are not evidentially useful
D. VDR data only needs to be preserved if a formal MAIB investigation is opened, which cannot happen without an actual collision
Sign in or create a free account to see the answer and explanation.
A. True
B. False
Sign in or create a free account to see the answer and explanation.
A. True
B. False
Sign in or create a free account to see the answer and explanation.
+465 more COLREGS questions available
Create a free account to practise all 468 questions, track your accuracy, and build your Reputation Score.
Create Free Account