Your company's SMS requires the bridge team to take avoiding action once CPA falls below a fixed threshold (e.g. 1.5nm), tighter than COLREGs itself specifies. Your examiner asks: "Does a company procedure like this override COLREGs, and how should you brief your OOWs on the relationship between the two?"
A. A company SMS threshold sits on top of COLREGs, not instead of it — it cannot override or contradict COLREGs' actual rules (a Rule 17 stand-on obligation still exists, for example), but it can and often should impose a more conservative internal trigger point to prompt earlier action, precisely because COLREGs describes a minimum legal standard, not a target for how close a professional bridge team should be willing to let a situation develop before acting
B. Company procedures are legally subordinate to COLREGs and therefore have no practical effect — OOWs should ignore the SMS threshold and rely on COLREGs judgement alone
C. Once a company sets an SMS threshold, COLREGs no longer applies onboard and the SMS becomes the sole governing standard
D. SMS-based CPA thresholds are not permitted under ISM and any company operating one is technically non-compliant
Sign in or create a free account to see the answer and explanation.
A. True
B. False
Sign in or create a free account to see the answer and explanation.
A. True
B. False
Sign in or create a free account to see the answer and explanation.
+465 more COLREGS questions available
Create a free account to practise all 468 questions, track your accuracy, and build your Reputation Score.
Create Free Account