Maritime Questions › Cargo & Stability
When reviewing the cargo plan for a Class 5.1 container, which check best reduces fire risk?
A. Confirm the declaration matches the container and apply IMDG segregation and stowage provisions against flammable and combustible cargoes and heat sources
B. Stow it as near as possible to the fire main
C. Stow it on top of any other dangerous goods
D. Ignore it as it is not flammable
Sign in or create a free account to see the answer and explanation.
A. Increased displacement generally raises the centre of gravity if weight is added high up, and free surface effects in partially-filled tanks can reduce the effective metacentric height (GM)
B. None — stability is fixed regardless of loading
C. Only the Chief Engineer needs to consider this, never the deck watchkeeper
D. Additional weight always improves stability regardless of where it is placed
Sign in or create a free account to see the answer and explanation.
A. Significant — a failed watertight closure compromises the subdivision the vessel's damage stability calculations rely on, potentially allowing progressive flooding between compartments in the event of damage
B. Negligible — watertight doors below the waterline are rarely closed anyway
C. Only relevant if the vessel carries passengers
D. This only matters when the vessel is at anchor
Sign in or create a free account to see the answer and explanation.
+236 more Cargo & Stability questions available
Create a free account to practise all 239 questions, track your accuracy, and build your Reputation Score.
Create Free Account