Maritime Questions › Cargo & Stability
In BSafe Case Study 15, after the fixed CO2 system was released and visible smoke reduced, what did the crew believe, and what was actually still happening?
A. They correctly believed the fire was out; there was no further risk
B. They believed the situation was stable, but the ammonium nitrate fertiliser's self-sustaining chemical decomposition was continuing regardless of the CO2
C. They knew the reaction was continuing and evacuated immediately
D. The CO2 system had actually failed to release at all
Sign in or create a free account to see the answer and explanation.
A. Only the Chief Engineer needs to consider this, never the deck watchkeeper
B. None — stability is fixed regardless of loading
C. Increased displacement generally raises the centre of gravity if weight is added high up, and free surface effects in partially-filled tanks can reduce the effective metacentric height (GM)
D. Additional weight always improves stability regardless of where it is placed
Sign in or create a free account to see the answer and explanation.
A. This only matters when the vessel is at anchor
B. Negligible — watertight doors below the waterline are rarely closed anyway
C. Only relevant if the vessel carries passengers
D. Significant — a failed watertight closure compromises the subdivision the vessel's damage stability calculations rely on, potentially allowing progressive flooding between compartments in the event of damage
Sign in or create a free account to see the answer and explanation.
+225 more Cargo & Stability questions available
Create a free account to practise all 228 questions, track your accuracy, and build your Reputation Score.
Create Free Account