Maritime Questions › Cargo & Stability
What real incident led the IMSBC Code to remove its "Ammonium Nitrate Based Fertilizer (Non-Hazardous)" schedule entirely in the 2022 edition?
A. The Tianjin port explosion of 2015
B. MV CHESHIRE (2017) — cargo declared non-SSD-liable underwent apparent self-sustaining decomposition during passage from Norway to Thailand
C. A dockside fire during loading at Antwerp in 2019
D. A laboratory finding with no real shipboard incident behind it
Sign in or create a free account to see the answer and explanation.
A. Only the Chief Engineer needs to consider this, never the deck watchkeeper
B. None — stability is fixed regardless of loading
C. Increased displacement generally raises the centre of gravity if weight is added high up, and free surface effects in partially-filled tanks can reduce the effective metacentric height (GM)
D. Additional weight always improves stability regardless of where it is placed
Sign in or create a free account to see the answer and explanation.
A. This only matters when the vessel is at anchor
B. Negligible — watertight doors below the waterline are rarely closed anyway
C. Only relevant if the vessel carries passengers
D. Significant — a failed watertight closure compromises the subdivision the vessel's damage stability calculations rely on, potentially allowing progressive flooding between compartments in the event of damage
Sign in or create a free account to see the answer and explanation.
+177 more Cargo & Stability questions available
Create a free account to practise all 180 questions, track your accuracy, and build your Reputation Score.
Create Free Account