BSafe Case Study 23 — Obscured for the Final 20 Seconds
Vessel: General cargo ship, alongside at a bulk terminal, Antwerp
Date & location: Main deck, hatch cover gantry crane operation during cargo discharge
Outcome: Fatal — a stevedore coordinator was crushed between the gantry crane's aft leg and a hatch cover
Human factors: An Obscured Sightline During Normal Operation · Positioning Not Visible to the Operator · Working Alarm Systems That Still Didn't Prevent the Incident
Source: Britannia P&I Club, BSafe Incident Case Study No. 23, drawn from MAIB Accident Report 12/2021
A Routine Hatch Cover Move
Discharging fine coke cargo, the chief officer operated the ship's gantry crane to stack hatch covers per the discharge plan, moving them one at a time from position 7 toward position 11. Before each move he checked both walkways and coamings were clear, climbed to the control position, and proceeded — a process that had already worked cleanly for hatch cover 11.
Meanwhile the stevedore coordinator, directing the shoreside crane by radio, climbed the ship's fixed ladders and leaned over a 2-metre hatch coaming to check on his team's progress inside the hold — checking in periodically as work continued in different parts of the hold.
A Line of Sight That Closed Without Anyone Noticing
As the chief officer began moving hatch cover 9 aft, he had a clear line of sight to the area where the coordinator was working. As the crane approached hatch cover position 10, the suspended hatch cover itself began blocking that same sightline. The full move from position 7 to 11 took about 45 seconds — the crush site was obscured from the crane's control position for the final 20 seconds of that travel. When the crane abruptly stopped, the chief officer didn't yet know why. A stevedore foreman, boarding the ship, spotted the coordinator's head above hatch cover 11 and realised something had happened. They found him trapped between the gantry crane's aft leg and the hatch cover, a gap of roughly 130mm. He was pronounced dead at the scene.
What MAIB's Investigation Found
- The crane's emergency stops, warning bell, and flashing light were all confirmed working correctly post-incident — this wasn't an equipment failure in the conventional sense.
- The warning bell was loud enough, and the flashing light visible enough, that ambient noise likely wasn't the reason they didn't prevent the incident — but the suspended hatch cover itself could have blocked the flashing light from the coordinator's specific position as the crane approached.
- A genuinely clear sightline existed at the start of the relevant move — the visibility gap only developed partway through, as the crane's own suspended load came between the operator and the crush site.
- The coordinator's exact position, checking on his team from above the coaming, placed him somewhere the crane operator had no way to see once the load itself became the obstruction.
Keep Reading — It's Free
You've read your free article. Create a free Crew Connect account to finish this one and read every other article on the site, free, forever.
Create Free Account & Keep Reading